Around Home Page  

Academic Program

 

Quality of the Academic Program for the Semester at Sea

By Gordon K. MacLeod

March 8, 2000

 

Introduction

Two years before the Fall 1999 Voyage on the Semester at Sea embarked, I had been designated Academic Dean and had to recruit some 30 faculty members from all over the U.S. to teach 73 courses in a globally oriented liberal arts curriculum.

Last Sep. 14, 1999 we embarked after a four-day orientation from Vancouver, BC together with 625 enthusiastic undergraduate students on board the SS Universe Explorer for an unforgettable adventure that took us around the world. For the next hundred days we sailed in a westerly direction with classes held every day from 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM while at sea. We stopped in ten different ports along the way, and arrived in Miami on December 23. Prior to arrival in each port, cultural and logistical preport lectures preceded diplomatic briefings from U.S. consulates after docking.

Itinerary

It took 13 days to cross the North Pacific. The only land we saw was a distant view of the Aleutian Islands. We spotted migrating whales, an occasional flying fish and some playful porpoises. Mostly calm beautiful weather, but we encountered one storm with seas up to 35 feet.

First stop was Kobe, Japan where students and faculty dispersed to pursue field assignments or participate in Faculty developed practica, stay around Kobe, or take Bullet Trains to Hiroshima, Kyoto, Tokyo and elsewhere. We left Japan after five days.

After three more days at sea and we arrived in Hong Kong. About half the students flew to Xi'an and Beijing. The other half stayed around Hong Kong and Macau or traveled to other cities in China. Beijing was celebrating the fiftieth anniversary of Communism in China. Prior to our departure I had arranged to give a talk through the Rockefeller Foundation's China Medical Board at Peking Union Medical College. After an hour-long presentation to the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences on the U.S. Health System, Chinese scholars questioned me for two more hours about whether China should set up a not-for-profit or for-profit health insurance system.

It took two days to sail from China to Ho Chi Minh City. Again, Students and Faculty dispersed to pursue field assignments and more sightseeing. Some flew off to Cambodia; others to Hanoi while many stayed and visited the vestiges of the war around the ship.

After four more days at sea, we reached Penang, Malaysia with students and Faculty fanning out around the country. Here, I led some 40 students on a faculty practicum to observe the practice of traditional Chinese Medicine providing health care to about half the population.

It took us three days to reach Chennai (formerly Madras), India. Again, I conducted a practicum for some 30 students to observe a pediatric unit in an ultra-modern academic medical center where 100 of 600 medical students were Americans.

While not part of the itinerary, the "Man Overboard" incident is worth mentioning. The captain said early on that a successful rescue was nigh on to impossible. At 12:30 at night, the man overboard call went out to everyone on the ship. It was a pitch-black night in the shark-infested waters on the Red Sea. Happily, the ship was able to turn sharply and the student's calls for help were heard; a lifeboat was lowered over the side and he was brought back on board, only to be sent home.

It took 11 days at sea to cross the Indian Ocean; almost all the passengers made a brief stop in Cairo to see the museum and to visit the pyramids and Sphinx at Giza. A few of us remained on board and joined a convoy of four monstrous ships gliding north through the Suez Canal. We rejoined the students in Port Said.

Two days later we arrived for a five-day stay in Istanbul with its beautiful mosques and museums. We happened upon Kofi Annan in an outdoor cafe and I invited him to visit the ship; unfortunately, he had to leave shortly for Ankara. More cultural exposure including an Ottoman Banquet was complete with music by a Mehter band.

We then sailed through the Aegean into the Adriatic Sea in two days to reach the medieval city of Dubrovnik, perched on the Dalmatian coast.

For the next two days we sailed through the Straight of Messina to Rome. Most of the voyagers visited St. Peter's Basilica, the restored Sistine Chapel, the Pantheon, and the Coliseum. Many went off to Florence and Venice. The rest went off to Southern Italy to Naples, Sorrento, Capri and the ruins at Pompeii.

Our last port, Casablanca, was reached in three days. Again, the students dispersed to Fez, Rabat, Marrakech, and elsewhere.

An eleven-day sail across the Atlantic brought us back home to Miami on December 23.

Passenger Type

627 Students
30 Faculty Members
39 Staff
32 Adult Passengers
29 Family Members of which 14 were children
200 Crew Members (est.)
Male/Female = 287/489 = 37%/63%

TOTAL PARTICIPANTS = 976(est.)

 

Students

Admission Guidelines

  • Grade point average 2.75 or better
  • Clearance by college or university judicial process
  • Required to take at least 12 credit hours of coursework
  • Average entering GPA = 3.16, 89 students < 2.75; 8 students < 2.5

Distribution of Students

  • 627 at start
  • 623 at end
  • 252 Colleges and Universities represented
  • 60 Foreign nationals (est.)
  • 25 from foreign universities
  • 91 college seniors
  • 379 college juniors
  • 150 Sophomores
  • 5 Freshmen
  • 2 High school age faculty children
  • 50 Seniors and family members audited courses
  • 30 College seniors were graduated

Student Break-down by School

  • 53 University of CA Schools (Santa Barbara, UCLA, Santa Cruz, Berkeley)
  • 32 University of Colorado
  • 32 University of Pittsburgh
  • 17 George Washington University
  • 16 University of Washington
  • 15 Dartmouth College
  • 13 Pennsylvania State University
  • 12 Stanford University
  • 10 University of San Diego
  • All other schools have less than 10

 

Faculty

All faculty and courses are approved through the respective departments within the University's College of Arts and Sciences. The University appoints the Academic Dean, Librarian, and Registrar for each voyage. The Dean is responsible for academic planning and implementation of the program during the course of the voyage. University of Pittsburgh grants academic credit for participation in Semester at Sea. Thus, credits earned meeting Pitt's required standards may be transferable to other universities and colleges.

Selection of Faculty

  • Teaching experience/awards
  • International experience
  • Diversity (race, gender, religion, etc.)
  • Compatibility

Distribution of Faculty

  • 10 Full Professors
  • 10 Associate Professors
  • 6 Assistant Professors; 2 Instructors, 2 Others
  • 6 Interport Lecturers, 9-10 Interport Students

 

Curriculum

    • 46 upper level courses
    • 27 lower level courses
    • Core Course

Humanities

English (11 courses)

Film Studies (1 course)

Art and Architecture (3 courses)

Linguistics (1 course)

Ethnomusicology (3 courses)

Religious Studies (3 courses)

Theatre Arts (3 courses)

 

Social Sciences

Anthropology (4 courses)

Communications (4 courses)

Economics (3 courses)

History (4 courses)

Political Science (3 courses)

Sociology (6 courses)

Women's Studies (2 courses)

 

Natural Sciences and Business Courses

Biology (3 courses)

Geography (3 courses)

Geology (3 courses)

Psychology (4 courses)

Business (8 courses)

Information Science (1 course)

 

Cultural Activities

  • University visits
  • Home-stays
  • Musical performances
  • Art Museums
  • Archeological sites
  • Clinics
  • Factories
  • Stock exchanges
  • Rural villages
  • Arboretums
  • Et cetera

 

Field Assignments (Examples)

  • Comparative economic development
  • Contrasting political systems
  • Diversity of religious and cultural values
  • Varied health delivery systems
  • Variations in opportunities for women

FDPs

Faculty Directed Practica are structured opportunities for observation, interaction, and participation in the culture of different countries. In each country visited, students are required to participate in a number of practica such as university visits, home-stays, diplomatic briefings, and musical performances to visits to archaeological sites, clinics, stock exchanges, museums, and rural villages.

Evaluations of Students

97 honor students, GPA=3.75 or better; 20 students got an "F" grade

Pre-voyage GPA/post-voyage GPA: 3.16/3.21

89 students entered with GPA < 2.75; 68 improved, 21 did not

10 students dropped below 2.0; 2 entered with GPA < 2.75

Student Evaluation of Faculty Scale 1 (low) - 5 (high)

  • Faculty member presented course in organized manner: Mean 3.84
  • Faculty member stimulated thinking: Mean 3.70
  • Faculty member evaluated work fairly: Mean 4.00
  • Faculty member made good use of examples to clarify concepts: Mean 4.00
  • Faculty member maintained a good learning environment: Mean 4.00
  • Faculty member was available to students: Mean 4.25
  • Overall: Mean 3.83

Evaluation of Core (Selected Excerpts from 578 students)

Quality of instruction Relevance of voyage itinerary Excellent 44 Very relevant 158

Above average 162 Relevant 247

Average 234 Some relevance 144

Below average 107 Not relevant 27

Poor 31

What percent of sessions did you attend? How was the intellectual level?

80-100% 305 Too high 41

50-79% 150 Appropriate 400

25- 49% 79 Too low 132

0- 24% 44

Evaluation of Core (Continued)

How much learned compared to home campus? Overall evaluation

More 107 Excellent 26

Same 257 Above average 122

Less 209 Average 212

Below average 109

Poor 57

Overall Voyage Evaluation (Excerpts from 554 students)

Better understanding of the world Better understanding of yourself

High 439 High 312

Moderate 109 Moderate 218

Low 5 Low 19

Missing 1 None 3

Missing 2

More confidence in yourself Desire for future travel

High 341 High 507

Moderate 182 Moderate 36

Low 23 Low 7

None 5 None 2

Missing 3 Missing 2

Hours per day at sea studying Demand of academic workload < 1 hour 160 More 65

1 - 2 hours 288 Same 182

3 - 4 hours 84 Less 305

> 4 hours 19 Missing 2

Missing 3

Overall quality of faculty Overall quality of teaching

Excellent 169 Excellent 88

Very good 222 Very good 234

Good 120 Good 168

Fair 30 Fair 51

Poor 10 Poor 10

Missing 3 Missing 3

Home

 

 

Home